1 Jul 2016
Psychoanalysis and Science
If, as Geneviève Morel asserts, both science and psychoanalysis search for knowledge in the Real, the question becomes, for Lacan: what is the Real? Mai Wegener recalls: ‘The Real is what one finds always at the same place. As soon as someone starts from the assumption that this Real stays in place or always returns in the same place without her doing, the possibility of science emerges. It exits from the magic relation to the Real in which the natural order is thought to depend on acts and rituals.’ As a consequence, psychoanalysis becomes interested in the ‘signification of chance’. As Lacan says in Seminar II: ‘We try to get the subject to make available to us, without any intention, his thoughts, as we say, his comments, his discourse, in other words that he should intentionally get as close as possible to chance.’
The workshop intends to address this emphasis on contingency both as clinical problem and in its relation to science.
Venue
ICI Berlin(Click for further documentation)
With
Marcus CoelenMonique David-Ménard
Michael Friedman
Kenneth Reinhard
Samo Tomšič
Michaela Wünsch
Organized by
Michaela WünschIn English
First published on: https://www.ici-berlin.org/events/psychoanalysis-and-science/Rights: © ICI Berlin