Cite as: Catharine Diehl, Introduction to the lecture Werner Hamacher, ‘Das Nicht im Satz’, part of the conference Un-titled, ICI Berlin, 2 July 2010, video recording, mp4, 02:11 <https://doi.org/10.25620/e100702-1_3>
2 Jul 2010

Introduction

By Catharine Diehl

Video in German

Format: mp4
Length: 00:02:11
First published on: https://www.ici-berlin.org/events/werner-hamacher/
Rights: © ICI Berlin

Part of the Lecture

Das Nicht im Satz / Werner Hamacher

When we say not-being, we speak, I think, not of something that is the opposite of being, but only of something different. (Plato, Sophist 257B)

How can we speak of non-being if to speak at all implies saying ‘some thing’? Would we not thereby impart being to the object of our utterance and thus contradict the very claim of our assertion? This linguistic and ontological difficulty raises the broader question of the nature of negation as a rhetorical, logical and political act. Negation cannot simply be opposed to or absolutely independent from affirmation but must instead be intertwined with positivity, since negation always involves a thing which is negated. But this can be called into question by asking whether every affirmation might only be achieved by negating other properties. Rather than starting from the premise that affirmation and negation are mutually exclusive, we wish to explore the possibility of a more intricate relationship between them. How might affirmation be expressed through negation and vice versa? This conference will focus on concepts of complex affirmations and negations in domains including rhetoric, logic, ontology, and politics.

Venue

ICI Berlin
(Click for further documentation)

Organized by

Fabio Camilletti
Catharine Diehl
Martin Doll

Part of the Conference

Un-titled: Affirming Negations Negating Affirmations

“When we say not-being, we speak, I think, not of something that is the opposite of being, but only of something different.” (Plato, Sophist 257B)

How can we speak of non-being if to speak at all implies saying “some thing”? Would we not thereby impart being to the object of our utterance and thus contradict the very claim of our assertion? This linguistic and ontological difficulty raises the broader question of the nature of negation as a rhetorical, logical and political act. Negation cannot simply be opposed to or absolutely independent from affirmation but must instead be intertwined with positivity, since negation always involves a thing which is negated. But this can be called into question by asking whether every affirmation might only be achieved by negating other properties. Rather than starting from the premise that affirmation and negation are mutually exclusive, we wish to explore the possibility of a more intricate relationship between them. How might affirmation be expressed through negation and vice versa? This conference will focus on concepts of complex affirmations and negations in domains including rhetoric, logic, ontology, and politics.


Further information can be found at http://negation.ici-berlin.org

Venue

ICI Berlin
(Click for further documentation)

With

Taylor Carman
Jeffrey Champlin
Tania Espinoza
Deborah Goldgaber
Geraldine Hertz
Beau Madison Mount
Jakob Norberg
Renate Schindler

Organized by

Fabio Camilletti
Catharine Diehl
Martin Doll