Philosophers of perception and psychologists first studied ‘multistable’ or ‘reversible’ figures, Kippbilder, in the nineteenth century. The earliest description of the phenomenon of a ‘sudden and involuntary change in the apparent position’ of a represented object occurred in a letter written by Louis Albert Necker in Geneva to Sir David Brewster on 24 May 1832 and published six months later in the Philosophical Magazine. The picture in question would become known as the Necker cube.
Keywords: abstract algebra; aspect-relative cognition; homonyms; mathematical analysis; multistable figures; multistability; Wittgenstein, Ludwig – Philosophical Investigations
Title
Aspects and Abstracta
Author(s)
B. Madison Mount
Identifier
Description
Philosophers of perception and psychologists first studied ‘multistable’ or ‘reversible’ figures, Kippbilder, in the nineteenth century. The earliest description of the phenomenon of a ‘sudden and involuntary change in the apparent position’ of a represented object occurred in a letter written by Louis Albert Necker in Geneva to Sir David Brewster on 24 May 1832 and published six months later in the Philosophical Magazine. The picture in question would become known as the Necker cube.
Is Part Of
Place
Vienna
Publisher
Turia + Kant
Date
2014
Subject
abstract algebra
aspect-relative cognition
homonyms
mathematical analysis
multistable figures
multistability
Wittgenstein, Ludwig – Philosophical Investigations
Rights
© by the author(s)
This version is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Bibliographic Citation
B. Madison Mount, ‘Aspects and Abstracta’, in Multistable Figures: On the Critical Potential of Ir/Reversible Aspect-Seeing, ed. by Christoph F. E. Holzhey, Cultural Inquiry, 8 (Vienna: Turia + Kant, 2014), pp. 41–66 <https://doi.org/10.37050/ci-08_03>
Language
en-GB
page start
41
page end
66
Source
Multistable Figures: On the Critical Potential of Ir/Reversible Aspect-Seeing, ed. by Christoph F. E. Holzhey, Cultural Inquiry, 8 (Vienna: Turia + Kant, 2014), pp. 41–66
Format
application/pdf

References

  • Ackerman, Diane, ‘De Re Propositional Attitudes toward Integers’, Southwestern Journal of Philosophy, 9 (1978), pp. 145–53 <https://doi.org/10.5840/swjphil19789231>
  • Aldrich, Virgil C., ‘Visual Metaphor’, Journal of Aesthetic Education, 2 (1968), pp. 73–86 <https://doi.org/10.2307/3331241>
  • Auerbach, David, ‘Saying It with Numerals’, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 35 (1994), pp. 130–46 <https://doi.org/10.1305/ndjfl/1040609300>
  • Benacerraf, Paul, ‘What Numbers Could Not Be’, Philosophical Review, 74 (1965), pp. 47–73 <https://doi.org/10.2307/2183530>
  • Benacerraf, Paul, ‘Mathematical Truth’, Journal of Philosophy, 70 (1973), pp. 661–79 <https://doi.org/10.2307/2025075>
  • Benussi, Vittorio, ‘Zur Psychologie des Gestalterfassens’, in Untersuchungen zur Gegenstandstheorie und Psychologie, ed. by Alexius Meinong (Leipzig: Johann Ambrosius Barth, 1904), pp. 303–448
  • Boolos, George, Logic, Logic, and Logic, ed. by John Burgess and Richard Jeffrey (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999)
  • Borges, Jorge Luis, Ficciones, trans. by Anthony Kerrigan (New York: Grove Press, 1962)
  • Brentano, Franz, ‘Über ein optisches Paradoxon’, Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 3 (1892), pp. 349–58
  • Brentano, Franz, ‘Zur Lehre von den optischen Täuschungen’, Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 6 (1893), pp. 1–7
  • Brugger, Peter, ‘One Hundred Years of an Ambiguous Figure: Happy Birthday, Duck/Rabbit!’, Perceptual and Motor Skills, 89 (1999), pp. 973–77 <https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1999.89.3.973>
  • Budd, Malcolm, ‘Wittgenstein on Seeing Aspects’, Mind, 96 (1987), pp. 1–17 <https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/XCVI.381.1>
  • Burgess, John and Gideon Rosen, A Subject with No Object: Strategies for Nominalistic Interpretation of Mathematics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997)
  • Bäck, Allan, On Reduplication: Logical Theories of Qualification (Leiden: Brill, 1996)
  • Choi, Sungho, ‘Dispositional Properties and Counterfactual Conditionals’, Mind, 117 (2008), pp. 795–841 <https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzn054>
  • Davidson, Donald, ‘The Logical Form of Action Sentences’, in The Logic of Decision and Action, ed. by Nicholas Rescher (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1967), pp. 81–95, rpt. with afterword in Davidson’s Essays on Actions and Events, 2nd edn (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2001), pp. 105–48
  • Demopoulos, William, ed., Frege’s Philosophy of Mathematics (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1995)
  • Diamond, Cora, The Realistic Spirit: Wittgenstein, Philosophy, and the Mind (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1995)
  • Dunlop, Charles E. M., ‘Wittgenstein on Sensation and Seeing-As’, Synthese, 60 (1984), pp. 349–67 <https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00485563>
  • Evans, Gareth, The Varieties of Reference (Oxford: Clarendon, 1982)
  • Fara, Michael, ‘Dispositions and Habituals’, Noûs, 39 (2005), pp. 43–82 <https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0029-4624.2005.00493.x>
  • Field, Hartry, Realism, Mathematics, and Modality (Oxford: Blackwell, 1989)
  • Fine, Kit, ‘Acts, Events, and Things’, in Language and Ontology: Proceedings of the Sixth International Wittgenstein Symposium/Sprache und Ontologie: Akten des 6. Internationalen Wittgenstein-Symposiums, ed. by Werner Leinfellner, Eric Kramer, and Jeffrey Schank (Vienna: Holder-Pichler-Tempsky, 1982), pp. 97–105
  • Fleming, Noel, ‘Recognizing and Seeing As’, Philosophical Review, 66 (1957), pp. 161–79 <https://doi.org/10.2307/2182372>
  • Gombrich, E. H., Art and Illusion: A Study in the Psychology of Pictorial Representation, 3rd edn (London: Phaidon, 1968)
  • Goodman, Nelson, ‘Seven Strictures on Similarity’, in Problems and Projects (Indianapolis: Hackett, 1982), pp. 437–46
  • Grice, Paul, Studies in the Way of Words (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1989)
  • Gödel, Kurt, ‘What Is Cantor’s Continuum Problem?’ (second version), in Philosophy of Mathematics: Selected Readings, ed. by Paul Benacerraf and Hilary Putnam (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1964), pp. 258–73, rpt. in Collected Works, ed. by Solomon Feferman et al., 5 vols (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990–2003), ii, pp. 245–70
  • Hellman, Geoffrey, ‘Category Theory and Mathematical Structuralism’, Philosophia Mathematica, 3rd ser., 11 (2003), pp. 129–57 <https://doi.org/10.1093/philmat/11.2.129>
  • Horsten, Leon, ‘Canonical Naming Systems’, Minds and Machines, 15 (2005), pp. 229–57 <https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-004-6590-1>
  • Howell, Robert, ‘Seeing As’, Synthese, 23 (1972), pp. 400–22 <https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00636293>
  • Ishiguro, Hidé, ‘Imagination’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supp. 41 (1967), pp. 37–56 <https://doi.org/10.1093/aristoteliansupp/41.1.19>
  • Jastrow, Joseph, ‘The Mind’s Eye’, Popular Science Monthly, 54 (1899), pp. 299–312, reprinted in his Fact and Fable in Psychology (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1900), pp. 275–95 <https://doi.org/10.1037/10919-008>
  • Kaplan, David, ‘Quantifying In’, in Words and Objections: Essays on the Work of W. V. Quine, ed. by Donald Davidson and Jaakko Hintikka (Dordrecht: Reidel, 1969), pp. 178–214, rpt. in Reference and Modality, ed. by Leonard Linsky (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1971), pp. 112–44
  • Kripke, Saul, Naming and Necessity (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1980)
  • Künne, Wolfgang, Abstrakte Gegenstände: Semantik und Ontologie, 2nd edn (Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann, 2007)
  • Le Lionnais, François, ‘Le Second Manifeste’, in OULIPO, La Littérature potentielle: Créations, re-créations, récréations (Paris: Gallimard, 1973), pp. 19–23
  • Levinson, Jerrold, ‘What a Musical Work Is’, Journal of Philosophy, 77 (1980), pp. 5–28, rpt. in his Music, Art, and Metaphysics: Essays in Philosophical Aesthetics, 2nd edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011), pp. 63–88
  • Lewis, David, On the Plurality of Worlds (Oxford: Blackwell, 1986)
  • Lewis, David, ‘Finkish Dispositions’, Philosophical Quarterly, 47 (1997), pp. 143–58 <https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9213.00052>
  • Lindenfeld, David F., The Transformation of Positivism: Alexius Meinong and European Thought, 1880–1920 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1980)
  • Lycan, William G., ‘Gombrich, Wittgenstein, and the Duck-Rabbit’, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 30 (1971), pp. 229–37 <https://doi.org/10.2307/429542>
  • Macpherson, Fiona, ‘Ambiguous Figures and the Content of Experience’, Noûs, 40 (2006), pp. 82–117 <https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0029-4624.2006.00602.x>
  • Maddy, Penelope, Realism in Mathematics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990)
  • Montague, Michelle, ‘Against Propositionalism’, Noûs, 41 (2007), pp. 503–18 <https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0068.2007.00657.x>
  • Necker, Louis Albert, ‘Observations on Some Remarkable Optical Phaenomena Seen in Switzerland, and on an Optical Phaenomenon which Occurs on Viewing a Figure of a Crystal or Geometrical Solid’, London and Edinburgh Philosophical Magazine, 3rd ser., 1.5 (1832), pp. 329–37 <https://doi.org/10.1080/14786443208647909>
  • Peacocke, Christopher, ‘Depiction’, Philosophical Review, 96 (1987), pp. 383–410 <https://doi.org/10.2307/2185226>
  • Peirce, Charles Sanders, ‘Prolegomena to an Apology for Pragmaticism’ (1906), in Collected Papers, ed. by Charles Hartshorne and Paul Weiss (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1931–58)
  • Queneau, Raymond, ‘Cent mille milliards de poèmes’, in Œuvres complètes, ed. by Claude Debon, 3 vols to date (Paris: Gallimard, 1989–), i, pp. 331–47
  • Schiffer, Stephen, ‘Language-Created Language-Independent Entities’, Philosophical Topics, 24 (1996), pp. 149–67 <https://doi.org/10.5840/philtopics199624117>
  • Steiner, Mark, ‘Platonism and the Causal Theory of Knowledge’, Journal of Philosophy, 70 (1973), pp. 57–66 <https://doi.org/10.2307/2024837>
  • Thomasson, Amie, Fiction and Metaphysics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999)
  • Vesey, G. N. A., ‘Seeing and Seeing-As’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 56 (1956), pp. 109–24 <https://doi.org/10.1093/aristotelian/56.1.109>
  • Wallin, J. E. W., Optical Illusions of Reversible Perspective: A Volume of Historical and Experimental Researches (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1905) <https://doi.org/10.1037/13687-000>
  • Wetzel, Linda, Types and Tokens: On Abstract Objects (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2009) <https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262013017.001.0001>
  • Williamson, Timothy, The Philosophy of Philosophy (Oxford: Blackwell, 2007) <https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470696675>
  • Witasek, Stephen, ‘Über die Natur der geometrisch-optischen Täuschungen’, Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 19 (1899), pp. 81–175
  • Wittgenstein, Ludwig, Werkausgabe (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1984)
  • Wittgenstein, Ludwig, Philosophical Investigations (Philosophische Untersuchungen), trans. by G. E. M. Anscombe, reissued 2nd edn (Oxford: Blackwell, 1997)
  • Wollheim, Richard, Art and Its Objects, 2nd edn (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980) <https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316286777>
  • Wolterstorff, Nicholas, Works and Worlds of Art (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1980)
  • Wright, Crispin, Frege’s Conception of Numbers as Objects (Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press, 1983)
  • van Rooten, Luis d’Antin, Mots d’heures, gousses, rames: The D’Antin Manuscript (London: Penguin, 1980)

Cite as: B. Madison Mount, ‘Aspects and Abstracta’, in Multistable Figures: On the Critical Potential of Ir/Reversible Aspect-Seeing, ed. by Christoph F. E. Holzhey, Cultural Inquiry, 8 (Vienna: Turia + Kant, 2014), pp. 41–66 <https://doi.org/10.37050/ci-08_03>