Book Sectionhttps://doi.org/10.37050/ci-08_10
The children’s book Duck! Rabbit! dramatizes the lesson that just because one is right, others don’t have to be wrong. An endless dispute is quickly settled once the quarrellers experience an aspect change or gestalt switch and thereby realize that the same picture can be seen in different ways. This simple scenario offers an intriguing model for arbitrating between conflicting positions by going back and forth between different aspects and thereby realizing that conflicting accounts can be equally valid.
Keywords: analysis (philosophy); aspect seeing; figure of thought; multistable figures; multistable visual perception; multistability; Kuhn, Thomas – The structure of scientific revolutions; philosophy of science
Rights: © by the author(s). This version is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Part of Multistable Figures Containing:
Blurb
Frontmatter
Introduction
KippCity / Christine Hentschel
Aspects and Abstracta / B. Madison Mount
Splitting Images: Understanding Irreversible Fractures through Aspect Change / Luca Di Blasi
The Munchausen Effect: Subjectivity and Ideology / Pascale Gillot
Cognition and Volition: Two Aspects of the Human in the Age of Experimental Systems / Benjamin Dawson
Identity Politics Redux / K. Heintzman
Multiple Temporalities of the Partisan Struggle: From Post-Yugoslav Nationalist Reconciliation Back to Partisan Poetry / Gal Kirn
Figuring Ambivalence, Capturing the Political: An Everyday Perspective / Brigitte Bargetz
Oscillations and Incommensurable Decisions: On the Multistable Use of Multistable Figures
Backmatter
Title
Oscillations and Incommensurable Decisions
Subtitle
On the Multistable Use of Multistable Figures
Author(s)
Christoph F. E. Holzhey
Identifier
https://doi.org/10.37050/ci-08_10
Description
The children’s book Duck! Rabbit! dramatizes the lesson that just because one is right, others don’t have to be wrong. An endless dispute is quickly settled once the quarrellers experience an aspect change or gestalt switch and thereby realize that the same picture can be seen in different ways. This simple scenario offers an intriguing model for arbitrating between conflicting positions by going back and forth between different aspects and thereby realizing that conflicting accounts can be equally valid.
Is Part Of
Multistable Figures
Place
Vienna
Publisher
Turia + Kant
Date
2014
Subject
analysis (philosophy)
aspect seeing
figure of thought
multistable figures
multistable visual perception
multistability
Kuhn, Thomas – The structure of scientific revolutions
philosophy of science
Rights
© by the author(s)
This version is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
Bibliographic Citation
Christoph F. E. Holzhey, ‘Oscillations and Incommensurable Decisions: On the Multistable Use of Multistable Figures’, in Multistable Figures: On the Critical Potential of Ir/Reversible Aspect-Seeing, ed. by Christoph F. E. Holzhey, Cultural Inquiry, 8 (Vienna: Turia + Kant, 2014), pp. 215–46 <https://doi.org/10.37050/ci-08_10>
Language
en-GB
page start
215
page end
246
Source
Multistable Figures: On the Critical Potential of Ir/Reversible Aspect-Seeing, ed. by Christoph F. E. Holzhey, Cultural Inquiry, 8 (Vienna: Turia + Kant, 2014), pp. 215–46
Format
application/pdf

References

  • Billig, Michael, ‘Lacan’s Misuse of Psychology: Evidence, Rhetoric and the Mirror Stage’, Theory, Culture & Society, 23.4 (2006), pp. 1–26 <https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276406066367>
  • Bohr, Niels, ‘On the Problem of Measurement in Atomic Physics (1946)’, in: Niels Bohr, Causality and Complementarity: Supplementary Papers Edited by Jan Faye and Henry J. Folse (Woodbridge, Conn.: Ox Bow Press, 1998), pp. 122–25
  • Daston, Lorraine, ‘Science Studies and the History of Science’, Critical Inquiry, 35 (2009), pp. 798–813 <https://doi.org/10.1086/599584>
  • Daston, Lorraine and Peter Galison, ‘The Image of Objectivity’, Representations, 40 (1992), pp. 81–128 <https://doi.org/10.2307/2928741>
  • Day, William, ‘Wanting to Say Something: Aspect-Blindness and Language’, in Seeing Wittgenstein Anew, ed. by William Day and Victor J. Krebs (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010)
  • Fortuna, Sara, Wittgensteins Philosophie des Kippbilds: Aspektwechsel, Ethik, Sprache (Vienna: Turia + Kant, 2012)
  • Hacking, Ian, Representing and Intervening: Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983) <https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511814563>
  • Hanson, Norwood Russell, Patterns of Discovery: An Inquiry into the Conceptual Foundations of Science (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1958)
  • Jastrow, Joseph, ‘The Mind’s Eye’, in Fact and Fable in Psychology (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1900), pp. 275–95 <https://doi.org/10.1037/10919-008>
  • Kelso, J. A. Scott, ‘Multistability and Metastability: Understanding Dynamic Coordination in the Brain’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 367.1591 (2012), pp. 906–18 <https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2011.0351>
  • Kuhn, Thomas S., ‘Possible Worlds in History of Science’, in The Road Since Structure: Philosophical Essays, 1970–1993, with an Autobiographical Interview (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2002)
  • Kuhn, Thomas S., The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 4th edn (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2012)
  • Lacan, Jacques, ‘The Mirror Stage as Formative of the Function of the I As Revealed in Psychoanalytic Experience’, in Écrits: The First Complete Edition in English (New York: Norton, 2006), pp. 75–81
  • Leopold, David A. and Nikos K. Logothetis, ‘Multistable Phenomena: Changing Views in Perception’, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3.7 (1999), pp. 254–64 <https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01332-7>
  • Long, Gerald M. and Thomas C. Toppino, ‘Enduring Interest in Perceptual Ambiguity: Alternating Views of Reversible Figures’, Psychological Bulletin, 130.5 (2004), pp. 748–68 <https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.130.5.748>
  • Mitchell, W. J. Thomas, Picture Theory (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994)
  • Rock, Irvin, Susannah Hall, and Janet Davis, ‘Why Do Ambiguous Figures Reverse?’, Acta Psychologica, 87 (1994), pp. 33–59 <https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(94)90065-5>
  • Rosenthal, Amy Krouse and Tom Lichtenheld, Duck! Rabbit! (San Francisco: Chronicle Books, 2009)
  • Schwartz, Jean-Luc, et al., eds, Multistability in Perception: Binding Sensory Modalities, special issue of Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 367.1591 (2012) <https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2011.0254>
  • Wittgenstein, Ludwig, Philosophical Investigations (Philosophische Untersuchungen), trans. by G. E. M. Anscombe, reissued 2nd edn (Oxford: Blackwell, 1997)

Cite as: Christoph F. E. Holzhey, ‘Oscillations and Incommensurable Decisions: On the Multistable Use of Multistable Figures’, in Multistable Figures: On the Critical Potential of Ir/Reversible Aspect-Seeing, ed. by Christoph F. E. Holzhey, Cultural Inquiry, 8 (Vienna: Turia + Kant, 2014), pp. 215–46 <https://doi.org/10.37050/ci-08_10>