Book Section
Stefano Visentin
Non Defuit Materia
Freedom and Necessity in Spinoza’s Democratic Theory
The relationship between politics and metaphysics in Spinoza’s philosophy has been highlighted by Antonio Negri in The Savage Anomaly. But the determinism of God’s power, implying the identity between freedom and necessity, has not been analysed in its political effects. This chapter will show by whom the imaginary reality of free will can be politically employed; that due to the identity between reality and perfection, a ‘real’ tyranny can be considered a ‘perfect’ regime; how a free multitude, living in a democratic regime, differentiates itself from an enslaved one, and how its freedom can be necessary.
Keywords: necessity; freedom; multitude; democracy; politics, practical; Spinoza, Baruch
Title |
Non Defuit Materia
|
Subtitle |
Freedom and Necessity in Spinoza’s Democratic Theory
|
Author(s) |
Stefano Visentin
|
Identifier | |
Description |
The relationship between politics and metaphysics in Spinoza’s philosophy has been highlighted by Antonio Negri in The Savage Anomaly. But the determinism of God’s power, implying the identity between freedom and necessity, has not been analysed in its political effects. This chapter will show by whom the imaginary reality of free will can be politically employed; that due to the identity between reality and perfection, a ‘real’ tyranny can be considered a ‘perfect’ regime; how a free multitude, living in a democratic regime, differentiates itself from an enslaved one, and how its freedom can be necessary.
|
Is Part Of | |
Place |
Berlin
|
Publisher |
ICI Berlin Press
|
Date |
2 March 2021
|
Subject |
necessity
freedom
multitude
democracy
politics, practical
Spinoza, Baruch
|
Rights |
© by the author(s)
Except for images or otherwise noted, this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
|
Language |
en-GB
|
page start |
39
|
page end |
54
|
Source |
Materialism and Politics, ed. by Bernardo Bianchi, Emilie Filion-Donato, Marlon Miguel, and Ayşe Yuva, Cultural Inquiry, 20 (Berlin: ICI Berlin Press, 2021), pp. 39–54
|
References
- Balibar, Étienne, ‘Spinoza, the Anti-Orwell: The Fear of the Masses’, Rethinking Marxism, 2.3 (1989), pp. 104–39
- Bennett, Jonathan, A Study of Spinoza’s Ethics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984)
- Bove, Laurent, Affirmation and Resistance in Spinoza: Strategy of the Conatus (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2020)
- Caporali, Riccardo, ‘La moltitudine e gli esclusi’, in Spinoza: individuo e moltitudine, ed. by Riccardo Caporali, Vittorio Morfino, and Stefano Visentin (Cesena: Il Ponte Vecchio, 2007), pp. 93–104
- Del Lucchese, Filippo, Conflict, Power, and Multitude in Machiavelli and Spinoza: Tumult and Indignation (London: Continuum, 2009)
- Fischbach, Franck, La Production des hommes. Marx avec Spinoza (Paris: Vrin, 2014)
- Garrett, Don, Nature and Necessity in Spinoza’s Philosophy (New York: Oxford University Press, 2018) <https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195307771.001.0001>
- Hardt, Michael, and Antonio Negri, Commonwealth (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2009) <https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjsf48h>
- Lordon, Frédéric, Willing Slaves of Capital: Spinoza and Marx on Desire (London: Verso Books, 2014)
- Lordon, Frédéric, Imperium. Structures et affects des corps politiques (Paris: La fabrique, 2015)
- Machiavelli, Niccolò, The Prince [1513], ed. by William J. Connell (Boston, MA: Bedford, 2005)
- Marx, Karl, ‘Thesen über Feuerbach’, in MEW, III (1958), pp. 5–7
- Matheron, Alexandre, ‘Women and Servants in Spinozist Democracy’, in Politics, Ontology and Knowledge in Spinoza (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2020), pp. 260–79
- Negri, Antonio, ‘Politiche dell’immanenza, politiche della trascendenza. Saggio popolare’, in Storia politica della moltitudine, ed. by Filippo Del Lucchese (Rome, DeriveApprodi, 2009), pp. 86–96
- Negri, Antonio, Spinoza for our Time: Politics and Postmodernity, trans. by William McCuaig (New York: Columbia University Press, 2013) <https://doi.org/10.7312/columbia/9780231160469.001.0001>
- Ritter, Karl, Prozesse der Befreiung. Marx, Spinoza und die Bedingungen eines freien Gemeinwesens (Münster: Westfälisches Dampfboot, 2011)
- Skeaff, Christopher, Becoming Political: Spinoza’s Vital Republicanism and the Democratic Power of Judgment (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2018) <https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226555508.001.0001>
- Spinoza, Benedictus de, Spinoza opera, ed. by Carl Gebhardt, 4 vols (Heidelberg: Winter, 1925)
- Spinoza, Benedictus de, The Collected Works of Spinoza, ed. and trans. by Edwin Curley, 2 vols (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1985–2016)
- Tosel, André, ‘La Finitude positive’, in Spinoza ou l’autre (in)finitude (Paris: L’Harmattan, 2008), pp. 157–72
- Visentin, Stefano, ‘Paura delle masse e desiderio dell’uno. Considerazioni sull’ambivalenza della potentia multitudinis’, in Storia politica della moltitudine, ed. by Del Lucchese, pp. 181–98
- Visentin, Stefano, ‘La parzialità dell’universale. La moltitudine nell’imperium aristocraticum’, in Spinoza: individuo e moltitudine, ed. by Riccardo Caporali, Vittorio Morfino, and Stefano Visentin (Cesena: Il Ponte Vecchio, 2007), pp. 373–90
- Visentin, Stefano, ‘A ontologia política de Espinosa na leitura de Antonio Negri’, Cadernos Espinosanos, 38 (2018), pp. 151–70
- Visentin, Stefano, ‘From Security to Peace and Concord: The Building of a Free Commonwealth in Spinoza’s Political Treatise’, Theoria, 66.2 (2019), pp. 71–90
- Zourabichvili, François, ‘L’Énigme de la multitude libre’, in La Multitude libre. Nouvelles lectures du ‘ Traité Politique’, ed. by Chantal Jaquet, Pascal Sévérac, and Ariel Suhamy (Paris: Amsterdam, 2008), pp. 69–80
Cite as:
Stefano Visentin, ‘Non Defuit Materia: Freedom and Necessity in Spinoza’s Democratic Theory’, in Materialism and Politics, ed. by Bernardo Bianchi, Emilie Filion-Donato, Marlon Miguel, and Ayşe Yuva, Cultural Inquiry, 20 (Berlin: ICI Berlin Press, 2021), pp. 39-54 <https://doi.org/10.37050/ci-20_02>